(12)Tj 21 Examples of Project Objectives - Simplicable /Annots [] 25.424 -24 Td /Fm0 Do ?~GV*KU>pzWo{#N2Cm7EsM[n1Mz[vn& $.R~|_6E~D\A1/VAB9Le=V J")p= B^yrs(j,S,~$>9|6P,7&yYA#n{(3v>=5 MDwC|(lALl5Ati*0$[@-wB !rDr^K]{\W{3ISJg39|1;-l ;>yNB`\^JNml!pF-}iSo11L[`Di7bnf$#4] FC` 48.11 0 Td [(MON)3.8 (G)-7 (L)10.1 (Y)2.8 (04276044-)3 (47, )-10.7 (s)-1.1 (t)-1.1 (a)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4 (s,)-2 ( \223)2.8 (R)-3.7 (e)4.7 (na)3.2 (l)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ubul)-2 (e)3.9 ( a)3.2 (d)-10 (e)-6 (nom)-1.1 (a)3 (s )-1.8 (oc)2.1 (c)4.9 (ur)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n . [(onc)4 (oge)4.8 (ni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( i)-1.9 (n m)-2.8 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 (e)3.2 ( )-9.1 (pr)2.9 (oduc)3.1 (in)-12.9 (g)10.8 ( a)3.1 ( dose)-6.8 (-)2 (r)3 (e)4.9 (l)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-11.9 (e)3.1 (d )-10 (i)-2 (nc)4.8 (r)3 (e)3.1 (a)4.9 (s)-10.9 (e)3 ( in)-2 ( re)5 (na)4.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2.9 (ubul)-2 (e)4.8 ( )-9.9 (a)-6.9 (de)4.8 (nom)-1.9 (a)3.9 (s,)-1.8 ( a)1.3 ( r)-6.1 (a)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ 0.428 -431.088 l A Request for Production (also known as a Demand for Inspection) asks the other side to produce and allow copying or inspection and measuring of a document or thing. /Filter /FlateDecode (7. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj Responding party objects as it invades their and third parties right of privacy. uuid:276adb5a-b13f-4138-aeb6-45e793f2ece0 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] The documents containing, including, or derived from "any verbatim statement of a third party" would include all documents created by Plaintiff in the course of the investigation preceding this case that touch explicitly or implicitly on any factual matter. T* endobj WebA sample request for the production of documents (RFP) that a party in a Florida circuit court civil case may use to request the production or inspection of documents or other Finally, Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory, in its . >> So what do you do? /Type /Page (19)Tj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endstream ( )Tj 2. Software. (25)Tj Requests for "Any and All" Documents Are Obsolete application/pdf )9 ( )-989.9 ([)-6.1 (Th)1.8 (i)-1.9 (s )-182 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (q)10 (ue)4.9 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 ( )-199.1 (i)-2.9 (s )-191.1 (l)-2 (i)-2.9 (st)-4 (e)4 (d )-189.1 (a)3 (s )-200.9 (N)1.9 (o. T* As noted above, such a log would include virtually every internal document created by Plaintiff over the course of Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] -73.07 -24 Td q 7. A discovery request can ask what evidence the person knows, but cannot ask what a person thinks the evidence means. Court408 F.3d 1142, 2005 WL 1175 922 (9th Cir.2005) [trial court affirmed in holding boilerplate objection without identification of documents is not the proper assertion of a privilege. T* [(oc)4 (c)4.8 (ur)3 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (d on or)3 ( a)3.2 (b)-9.1 (out)-2.9 ( S)-4 (e)3.9 (pt)-1.9 (e)4.8 (m)-2.7 (be)4.7 (r)3 ( 4, 1985. Q q Use Request for Production | California Courts | Self Help Guide BT f /TT0 12 Tf f [(c)4 (ont)-2 (a)4 (i)-1.9 (n a)4.5 ( pr)3 (e)-6.7 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (se)1.9 ( de)-6.7 (f)3.7 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2.9 (t)-2 (i)-2 (on of)3 ( t)-2 (he)4 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (nd r)-6.1 (e)3.9 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)3 (e)-5.9 (nc)3.9 (e)3.2 (s )-2 (a)3 ( va)-5.9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (t)-21.1 (y)19.1 ( of)3.8 ( t)-2.7 (ox)-9.2 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)19 ( )]TJ T* Q Q /OCProperties 2 0 R 3 on the grounds that it is vague and ambiguous, that it calls for the production of documents that are irrelevant to this action and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome, to the extent that it calls for the production of documents in the format as they may be maintained in files outside of the principal investigatory and case files. /Parent 15 0 R Sample California request for production of documents - SlideShare 44.77 0 Td [(D)2 (E)-3.8 (N)2.8 (IE)-5.8 (S)]TJ [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. (11)Tj q Model objections to document requests, sometimes referred to as requests for production or RFPs, for an employer's counsel to use when responding to a plaintiff's document requests in a single plaintiff employment discrimination case brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA . ( )Tj [(Mo)-2 (ns)-13 (a)4.8 (nt)-2.8 (o )]TJ >> [(c)4 (hr)3.8 (oni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)3 (it)-14 (y)29.1 ( st)-3.1 (udi)-2 (e)3 (s o)-10.9 (n g)10.8 (l)-22.7 (y)20.7 (phosa)1.3 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 ( )-10 (\()3.8 (a)3.2 (l)-1.1 (l)-2 ( 12-)2.9 (m)-1.9 (on)-10.9 (t)-1.1 (hs )-2 (or long)10.9 (e)-6.8 (r)3 (\))3.8 ( use)2.1 (d i)-1.9 (n t)-2 (he)3.9 ( )-10.8 (l)-2 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( r)2.1 (e)4 (s)-10 (e)3.9 (a)3.2 (r)-6.1 (c)3.1 (h a)4 (nd )]TJ ( )Tj 51 0 obj acquire the most less latency era to download any of our books afterward this one. /Annots [] f endstream 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm q )]TJ (27)Tj /TT0 12 Tf T* )]TJ >> /PageElement 38 0 R regarding requests for production of documents. The above is an example of inappropriate boilerplate objections. 5 regarding "third party" to the extent it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation." 192.96 0 Td W n [(pr)3 (e)4.8 (l)-2.7 (i)-2.1 (m)-2 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (r)-16.9 (y)29.9 ( )20.9 (sc)2.1 (i)-1.9 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (i)7.1 (f)3.8 (i)-1.9 (c)13.9 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (vi)-1.1 (e)3 (w)2 ( a)4.9 (nd e)3.1 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)4.8 (t)-2.8 (i)-1.9 (on of)2.8 ( st)-3.7 (ud)-9.2 (y)19.9 ( )10 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)3.9 (77-)3 (42)10 (0, t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( )-10 (g)9.9 (l)-1.9 (y)19.9 (pho)10 (sa)2.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3 ( )]TJ 0 -791.16 l A specific response may repeat a general objection for emphasis or some other reason. /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] /TT0 12 Tf /TT0 12 Tf /Type /Pages Q /Length 154 0 R /Font 135 0 R Inserting this language into the request only hurts you. )]TJ 51.12 0 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm T* C.C.P. 25.928 -24 Td endstream T* 36 0 Td -39.96 -12 Td +(91)-9821210096 | how to say nevermind professionally in an email. 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3); Hickman v. Taylor 329 U.S. 495 (1947). (18)Tj [(st)-2.2 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (Notwi)-1.2 (t)-2.9 (hst)-4.8 (a)4.7 (ndi)-1.9 (ng Mo)-2 (ns)-3.9 (a)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (ob)-1.8 (j)-2.9 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (on, Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3 (nto)-2 ( )]TJ stream endstream 49.55 0 Td ( )Tj All responsive documents within the custody and control of responding party will be produced. T* (3. sample objections to request for production of documents texas Common Objections to Discovery Requests | California Courts | Self Help 6. [(Mo)-1.8 (ns)-3.7 (a)-6 (nt)-1.1 (o )]TJ All rights reserved. (20)Tj Rule 45 (d) (2 (B) (i). Requests for admissions, which are written requests that ask the other side to admit or deny certain facts about the case. 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re q (2. (15)Tj 20 Production Worker Resume Objective Examples | Indeed.com [(t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (s )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.9 (que)3.2 (st)-3.9 ( )10.8 (a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (wr)5 (i)-1.8 (t)-2.1 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (n. Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ 37.07 0 Td [(2017\))2.9 (])-6 (. /TT0 12 Tf (21)Tj 53 0 obj [(e)4 (va)4.8 (l)-2.7 (ua)4.7 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (be)2.8 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (g)9.9 ( done)4 ( b)-10.7 (y)20.7 ( )-9.9 (Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (o dur)2 (in)-12.8 (g)10.7 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.1 ( 1)-9.9 (991 t)-2 (hr)2.9 (oug)10 (h 2017 p)-9.9 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (i)-1.1 (od )-10.8 (i)-2 (nvol)-1.2 (vi)-2 (ng)9.1 ( a)4.8 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2.8 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 ( )]TJ (13)Tj >> Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks information that is readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, including, but not limited to, interrogatory answers that Defendant produced to Plaintiff, transcripts of depositions of current or former directors, officers, and employees of Defendant, documents that Defendant produced to Plaintiff, and correspondence and other communications from Defendant to Plaintiff. T* The Southern District of New York again illustrates the point. (M)Tj >> OBJECTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS. T* /Resources 103 0 R ET Assume you receive the following response to your Requests for Production of Documents: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] (3)Tj T* [(of)3 ( i)-2 (nf)3 (or)3.8 (m)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (on pr)3.8 (ot)-2.7 (e)4.7 (c)3.2 (t)-12 (e)4.8 (d )-9.9 (b)-10.8 (y)20.7 ( t)-2.7 (he)4.7 ( )-10.7 (a)3.9 (t)-2 (t)-2 (or)3 (ne)-16 (y)20.8 (-)-7.7 (c)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 ( pr)2.8 (i)-1.9 (vi)-2 (l)-2 (e)4 (g)10 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (a)3.9 (nd/)-1.9 (or)2 ( a)4 (t)-1.9 (t)-2 (or)3 (n)-9.1 (e)-16.9 (y)20.8 ( w)-8.8 (or)3.8 (k pr)3 (oduc)3.2 (t)-1.1 ( doc)3.1 (t)-1.9 (r)2.8 (i)-1.9 (ne)4.8 (. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.4768 86.2909 Tm T* 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm /Type /Page Plaintiff will make available for inspection at Plaintiff's offices responsive documents. These interviews were conducted by attorneys and staff of Plaintiff. /TT1 12 Tf m)-2 (a)4 (l)-2 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ /Title () ET 1 g )-9.9 ( )]TJ 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t,)-2 ( af)4 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)3.1 (son)-11.1 (a)4.8 (bl)-2.8 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ q T* Plaintiff further objects to this instruction as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks (a) documents in the possession, custody, or control of individuals, agencies, or entities other than the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, economists, and consultants either assigned to or reviewing this case, (b) documents and answers to interrogatories previously produced by Defendant to Plaintiff in the course of Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, all transcripts of depositions of employees and former employees of Defendant, all correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant, all other information provided by Defendant to Plaintiff, and all information produced by Plaintiff to Defendant in response to discovery requests of Defendant, and (c) documents in possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present officers, employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, and consultants to which the attorney work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, attorney-client privilege, or any other lawful privilege is applicable. << Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. T* [( t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (e)3.9 (d doc)3.1 (um)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (a)3 ( f)3.8 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( a)-6.9 (ge)4.8 (n)-10.7 (c)-5.2 (y)19 ( d)-9.8 (e)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (m)-1.1 (i)-2 (na)3.1 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on of)2.9 ( EP)-2.7 (A)1.9 (. [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (t)-3 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (d)8.1 (oc)4.9 (um)-2.8 (e)4.8 (nt)-2 ( w)2 (a)3.1 (s c)-6 (r)2.9 (e)3.1 (a)4 (t)-11 (e)3.9 (d )]TJ [(a)4 (f)3.8 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (r)3 ( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (o )-10.9 (r)3 (e)4.8 (c)-6.8 (e)4.8 (i)-1.9 (ve)3.9 (d )-10.7 (EP)-1.4 (A)1.1 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (J)-12 (ul)-11.1 (y)29.9 ( 29, 1985 l)-1.9 (e)3.9 (t)-1.9 (t)-12 (e)3 (r)3 ( \()3.9 (MON)-7.7 (G)-7.1 (L)10 (Y)2.9 (04269006-)-7.8 (07\))3 (. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Page Avoiding the Technical Mistakes When Drafting Written Discovery. [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ 123.83 538.67 436.19 -1.19 re Dont say if anything is being withheld on the basis of the objection. BT (11)Tj ( )Tj 2017-10-16T17:22:13-07:00 )]TJ T* 33.452 -24 Td /TT0 12 Tf /TT0 12 Tf [(R)-2.1 (e)3 (que)4 (st)-3.6 (s)-1.1 ( a)3.9 (nd a)4.9 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( i)-2.8 (nc)4.8 (or)3 (po)-10.8 (r)3 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d b)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (f)2.2 (e)-5.1 (r)2.9 (e)3.2 (nc)-5.1 (e)3 ( th)-2 (e)2 (r)-6 (e)3 (in)-2 (. GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. Plaintiff objects to Definition No. /Length 125 0 R << [(a)4 (ppe)4.8 (a)4 (r)2.1 (e)4.9 (d )9.1 (onc)14.1 (og)9.9 (e)4 (ni)-1.9 (c)13.9 (. f /TT1 12 Tf C.C.P. /TT1 12 Tf T* ( )Tj [(W)-5.1 (i)-2.9 (l)-2 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (a)3.1 (m)-2 ( D)-7.1 (y)29.9 (kst)-4.6 (r)3.7 (a)3.2 (, P)-3.1 (h.D)1.9 (., )-10.8 (To)1.8 (x)-8.1 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (ol)-1.9 (ogy)19.9 ( )-10.7 (B)7.7 (r)3 (a)3.1 (n)-9 (c)3.9 (h, EP)-1.9 (A)-8.9 ( H)2 (a)4.8 (z)-6.8 (a)4 (r)3.8 (d Ev)2 (a)4.1 (lu)-2 (a)2 (t)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (on Divis)-12.9 (i)-1.1 (on, )]TJ /Length 144 0 R endobj (28)Tj -287.434 -24 Td T* /TT0 12 Tf [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. Indeed, the Court has ordered the parties to disclose the likelihood that they will call those persons as witnesses, and Plaintiff has done so, reducing the list of 184 individuals and entities to 31 individuals whose testimony Plaintiff is very likely or likely to present at trial, either by live testimony or deposition. [( t)-2 (ha)4 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.7 ( c)3.2 (i)-1.9 (t)-1.2 (e)3.1 (d doc)4 (um)-1.9 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (a)3.8 ( f)3 (or)2.1 (mal a)-6 (ge)3.9 (nc)-15.9 (y)19 ( de)-5 (t)-2 (e)3 (r)3 (m)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (t)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (on of)2 ( EPA. /Length 132 0 R T* stream [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (nd)-9 (um)-2.9 ( da)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d 9/)-1.9 (4/)-2 (84 f)2.9 (r)2.2 (om)-1.1 ( )]TJ 5. T* 60 0 obj [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (s )-1.6 (t)-2.8 (o c)3.6 (om)-1.7 (pe)4.6 (t)-2.7 (e)-6.1 (nc)3.9 (e)4.9 (, r)3 (e)3.1 (l)-11.9 (e)4.8 (va)3.2 (nc)-5.1 (e)3.9 (, m)-1.9 (a)3 (ter)4.9 (i)-11.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (t)-2.9 (y)20.8 (,)-10.7 ( pr)2.8 (op)-9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3 (t)-21 (y)19.9 (, a)3.1 (nd a)4.9 (dm)-2.8 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-12 (bi)-2 (l)-1.1 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29 (, )-9.9 (a)4.8 (nd a)4 (n)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( a)3.1 (nd )-9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( )]TJ )Tj (11)Tj [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. ( )Tj (3)Tj 15.83 -48 Td 17.451 -72 Td (6)Tj (20)Tj x%0>7P{oE%1D If the request is not reasonably related to any claim or defense, and if there is no good reason to go beyond the ordinary scope of discovery under Rule 26(b), take the time to explain why in your discovery response. -72 -24 Td /Filter /FlateDecode ( )Tj Responding party objects that the request fails to specifically describe each individual item sought or reasonably particularize each category of item sought. [(D)2 (i)-2 (vi)-1.1 (si)-4 (on c)3.9 (onc)3.1 (l)-1.9 (ude)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (na)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2 (ubul)-1.1 (e)3 ( )-9 (a)3.9 (de)3.2 (nom)-2 (a)4 (s)-10.1 ( f)2.9 (ound i)-1.9 (n t)-2.9 (he)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (d-)3.8 ( a)3.1 (nd hig)7.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.8 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (g)9.1 (r)3.8 (oup )]TJ /Resources 123 0 R x+ | /Type /Catalog Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it seeks documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. [(i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (e)3 (r)3 (pose)2.3 (d a)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2.8 (he)4.6 ( t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (m)-2 (e)4.8 ( of)3 ( )-10.7 (t)-2 (r)2.8 (i)-1.9 (a)4 (l)-1.9 (. )]TJ /TT1 12 Tf The party, person, or attorney did not respond in good faith to a request for production of documents made pursuant to Section 2020.010, 2020.410, 2020.510, or 2025.210, or to an inspection demand made pursuant to Section 2031.010. [(1991 t)-1.1 (hr)2 (oug)10.9 (h 2017. ET 1. endobj (21)Tj BT -103.32 -24 Td 0.71 -791.16 l >> When Do I Have to Bring a Motion to Compel Written Discovery? >> q T* endobj endstream [(ont)-2 (h or)2.9 ( l)-1.9 (ong)9.1 (e)4.8 (r)2.2 ( )-10 (a)4.8 (ni)-2.7 (m)-2 (a)4.7 (l)-2.7 ( c)-6.1 (hr)3 (oni)-2 (c)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-9.1 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)29.9 ( st)-3.8 (udi)-2.9 (e)4.8 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.9 (h)-10 (a)3 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( ha)3 (s c)3 (onduc)4.9 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d on )-10.8 (g)10.8 (l)-11.9 (y)19 (p)-9 (hos)-1.9 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( )-10.8 (be)4.8 (t)-2.7 (w)2.7 (e)-6.8 (e)4 (n )]TJ 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -6.7270933 -39.599996 cm (25)Tj /Parent 15 0 R See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3); Hickman v. Taylor 329 U.S. 495 (1947). Plaintiff objects to Definition No. 5 0 obj (1)Tj << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] A response to a document request or interrogatory stating that objections and/or indicating that documents will be produced shall not be deemed or construed that there are, in fact, responsive documents, that Plaintiff performed any of the acts described in the document request, interrogatory, or definitions and/or instructions applicable to the document request or interrogatory, or that Plaintiff acquiesces in the characterization of the conduct or activities contained in the document request, interrogatory, or definitions and/or instructions applicable to the document request or interrogatory. PDF Laura Salerno Owens, OSB #076230 LauraSalerno@MarkowitzHerbold.com ( )Tj uuid:6655538f-926d-4155-9895-cad3e0717c55 48 0 Td ( )Tj Plaintiff further objects to this definition to the extent that it uses the undefined term "during." Q /Parent 8 0 R /Pages 8 0 R /Annots [] 36 -24 Td Similarly, the subpoena recipient may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena in the court where compliance is required. q /TT0 12 Tf Call Us Today! T* If you need to request documents in an employment discrimination case or if you need to respond to a request for documents from the other side, you can get templates from the Legal Help Centers. 12 i)-1.9 (n )]TJ T* f /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] T* /TT0 12 Tf [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ q ET /Type /Page Plaintiff does not and cannot know "all facts known" (emphasis supplied) to such individuals and entities that are relevant to the claims at issue here. 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re 29.4 648.61 Td >> [(A)1.9 (D)2.9 (M)4 (IT)-4.8 (S)]TJ 51.12 0 Td 44.77 0 Td )]TJ -72 -24 Td 1) litigators are not sending them. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm 36 0 Td Q (15)Tj /TT0 12 Tf Q [(D)2.8 (E)-3.7 (N)2.7 (I)-1.8 (E)-2.9 (S)]TJ Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. [(P)11 (L)-3 (A)1.9 (INT)-2.7 (I)-10.9 (FF)12.7 (\222)2.9 (S)-3.9 ( R)1.9 (E)-3.7 (Q)-2 (U)1.9 (E)-12.9 (S)-4 (T)-2.2 (S)-4 ( F)10.1 (O)-1.9 (R)1.9 ( A)2.9 (D)2 (M)3.1 (IS)-4 (S)-4.9 (IO)-4 (N)1.9 (S)-3.1 ( A)1.1 (N)2 (D)2 ( M)4.9 (O)-2 (N)2 (S)-4.8 (A)2.7 (N)2.1 (T)-3.8 (O)-2 (\222)3.8 (S)-4.8 ( R)1.9 (E)-2.9 (S)-3.1 (P)10.9 (O)-2.8 (N)2.8 (S)-4.8 (E)-3 (S)-3.1 ( )]TJ >> 48 0 Td BT (17)Tj 44.77 0 Td Nor have such notes and/or memoranda of interviews been seen by anyone other than the case staff and other attorneys and staff of Plaintiff assisting with or reviewing the investigation. )Tj Q endobj 22 0 obj T* Continue Reading Does the 45-Day Rule Apply when no Privilege Log was Served? 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 528.6613195 755.2367083 cm T* /acircumflex /atilde /adieresis /aring /ae /ccedilla /egrave /eacute /ecircumflex /edieresis 286.67 0 Td 6. BT endobj (14)Tj /Rotate 0 q T* Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3 (n)-9.9 (t)-1.9 (o )]TJ Model Objections for Responses to Requests for Production: To Plaintiff /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [(C)-13 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (. /Annots [] T* << T* T* -46.55 -48 Td -103.32 -24 Td Q Interview memoranda of the Antitrust Division, however, and notes of such interviews are protected from discovery by the work product doctrine. [(D)2 (E)-2.1 (NI)1.1 (E)-2 (S)]TJ /GS0 gs 3365 [(A)1.1 (D)2 (M)4.9 (I)-1.8 (T)-3 (S)]TJ [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. (22)Tj (13)Tj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 314.4112 86.2909 Tm (16)Tj Q [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.6 (r)2 (e)4.9 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (e)3.9 (s )-1.8 (a)2.1 (n)-9.9 (d obj)-1.9 (e)4.7 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (i)-2 (ons)-1.9 ( t)-1.9 (o pl)-2 (a)3.9 (i)-1.9 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)3 (\222)3.8 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.7 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (a)2.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( m)-2.7 (a)4.7 (d)-10.7 (e)3.9 ( so)-2 (l)-2.9 (e)3.9 (l)-11.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (f)3.8 (o)-9.9 (r)2.1 ( )]TJ . 47.77 0 Td 0 -24 TD endobj Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. (NRCP 36; JCRCP 36.) /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* In its Response to Document Request No. /Annots [] -310.67 -24 Td /TT0 12 Tf Response to Interrogatories . 1 g endstream Rule of Court Changes for Remote Depositions. 40 0 obj [(g)10.8 (l)-22.8 (y)20.8 (phos)-1.8 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( )-10.8 (c)4.8 (ont)-2.8 (a)4.8 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2.9 (ng)-380 (f)3 (or)3.8 (m)-2.7 (u)9.8 (lat)9.9 (i)-1.9 (o)9 (ns)9.1 ( )-59.1 (so)-2 (l)-3.9 (d )-60 (i)-1.1 (n )-50.9 (t)-1.9 (he)4.7 ( )-49.9 (U)1.1 (ni)-1.1 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (d )-50 (S)-4 (t)-1.9 (a)13.9 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-51 (a)13.9 (s)-1.8 ( )-60 (of)3 ( )-49.1 (J)-11.9 (une)4 ( )-49.1 (29, )-60.9 (2017. << PROPOUNDING PARTY: PAUL SAMPLE . 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm stream T* (9)Tj /Resources 51 0 R /TT0 12 Tf /TT0 12 Tf GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. /XObject 146 0 R (24)Tj [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( EP)-1.2 (A )2 (i)9.9 (nf)3 (or)13 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (d Mo)7.2 (nsa)12.1 (nt)8.9 (o on J)-11.8 (ul)-12 (y)29.9 ( )30.9 (29, 1)-10 (985, t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (a)2 (f)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( E)11 (P)-4.8 (A)1.9 (\222)13 (s )]TJ 17 0 obj (8)Tj >> [( t)-1.1 (hi)-2 (s )-2 (R)-4.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-3 (. 23.207 -24 Td Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 was not an investigation, it was a document request. Notwithstanding said objections, no documents. BT /TT1 12 Tf T* stream 1 g 48 0 Td T* (10)Tj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> endobj [(se)2.9 (r)3 (ve)4.8 (d b)-20.8 (y)20.8 ( m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (i)-1.9 (l)-2 ( a)3.9 (nd )-10.8 (\223)4.8 (e)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (he)-6.8 (r)2.8 ( t)-1.8 (he)4.7 ( pl)-2.7 (a)4.7 (c)3.2 (e)4 ( o)-9.1 (f)2.9 ( m)-1.9 (a)3 (il)-4 (i)-2 (ng)9 ( o)-9 (r)2.9 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( pl)-1.9 (a)3 (c)4 (e)4.9 ( o)-10.8 (f)3 ( a)4.8 (ddr)-7.8 (e)4 (ss)-3 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (ou)-2 (t)-2.1 (si)-4 (de)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.1 ( S)-3.1 (t)-2 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.1 ( of)3 ( )]TJ [(m)-1.1 (ont)-2 (h or)2.9 ( l)-1.9 (ong)9.1 (e)4.8 (r)2.2 ( )-10 (c)4.8 (hr)3 (oni)-1.9 (c)3.1 ( t)-11.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)4.7 (i)-2.7 (t)-11.2 (y)29.9 ( st)-4.6 (udi)-2 (e)4.7 (s )-1.8 (t)-3.7 (ha)4.7 (t)-1.9 ( i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( ha)4.7 (s)-1.7 ( c)4.7 (onduc)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (d on )-9.1 (g)9.1 (l)-21.1 (y)19.1 (phosa)2.1 (t)-1.9 (e)4.7 ( )-9.9 (c)3.1 (ont)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-1.9 (ni)-1.2 (ng)9.9 ( )]TJ 47.77 0 Td T* /Filter /FlateDecode (27)Tj dog off leash ticket california; Income Tax. Continue Reading WHY THESE OBJECTIONS ARE GARBAGE. << T* ET 51.12 0 Td 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm [(A)2 (m)-2 (e)4 (n)9.9 (de)4 (d)10 ( )-199 (a)3.1 (nd )10.8 (S)5.2 (upp)10.8 (l)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (nt)-2.7 (a)13.9 (l)-2 ( R)-3 (e)13.9 (que)14 (st)7 (s )-1.8 (f)2 (or)2.1 ( )10.9 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)6 (i)-1.9 (ons \()1.8 (J)-11 (une)4.8 ( 29, )9.1 (2017\))13 (])-6 (. /Rotate 0 << /TT1 12 Tf 59 0 obj /Parent 15 0 R (28)Tj ET /Filter /FlateDecode Plaintiff incorporates by reference every general objection set forth above into each specific response set forth below. endobj Responding To The Other Side's Requests For Information T* 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re << Objections to requests for production should be specific, not generalized, and should be in compliance with the provisions of Rule 34(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ 36 -24 Td endobj Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)4 (nt)-2 (o )]TJ -332.51 -24 Td 49.55 0 Td T* [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (nd gr)3.9 (ounds )-1.8 (t)-3.8 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (oul)-1.9 (d r)2.9 (e)3.1 (quire)4.9 ( t)-2.7 (h)-9.2 (e)3.9 ( e)3.1 (x)-9 (c)3.9 (l)-1.9 (usi)-4.9 (on f)3.8 (r)3 (om)-1.9 ( e)3 (vid)-2 (e)2 (nc)4.9 (e)4 ( o)-10.8 (f)3 ( a)-6 (n)-10 (y)20.8 ( st)-3.8 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (ment o)-10.9 (r)3.8 ( ot)-2.8 (he)4.8 (r)3 ( )]TJ